Danny highlighted how many aggregators of aggregators and content cesspools are bogusly clogging up Google’s search results with sites that would be viewed as spam if the owner was not socially well connected:
You kind of feel sorry for Joe Schmoe. Build a name by once having worked for Apple or by having written a few marketing books, and you seem to get much better treatment than Joe would get if he pulled the same SEO play stunts.
Alltop, Mahalo, Squidoo — none of them dominate Google. But seriously, Squidoo has a PR8 home page? Alltop has a PR7? Search Engine Land, which actually produces original content, sits with a PR6 — but these guys that simply compile content from others get a big fat PR kiss on the lips?
Hey, I don’t fret about PR scores. I know how meaningless they can be. But Joe Schmoe who tried to launch one of these types of sites wouldn’t get any PR at all. Google would have shut them down long ago. Lesson here? To be a really successful SEO, get successful at something else, then jump into your SEO play.
Danny Sullivan is probably the only neutral reporter in the search space with a decade + of experience AND a background in traditional journalism. He is usually quite neutral, so for him to say that, you know Google is screwing up pretty bad.
If you are good at public relations you can have all the PageRank you want. Can’t afford a proper public relations campaign? Have no brand equity other than being branded as an SEO? You are the scum that makes the internet a cesspool. Better luck next life!
If you can’t be found you don’t exist. As Google’s “spam team” grows more subjective with the definition of spam (hey I know him it’s not spam, never heard of him it’s spam, etc.) the web loses out on its diversity. Meanwhile how about you view some great fraudulent government grant ads through AdWords.
Google’s public relations team publicly lied about cleaning those fraudulent ads up.
“Our AdWords Content Policy does not permit ads for sites that make false claims, and we investigate and remove any ads that violate our policies,” said Google in a statement e-mailed to ClickZ News. “We have discussed these issues with the Federal Trade Commission and reaffirmed our commitment to protecting users from scam ads.”
The above LIE was quoted from an article published 3 weeks ago, but Google is still making over $10,000 a day carpet-bombing searchers with that reverse billing fraud (and probably $10,000′s more on the content network).
Spam is only spam *if* the spammer is not paying Google and they are too small to fight back against the often arbitrary and injust decisions of the irrational Google engineers that “fight spam” while turning a blind eye to grant scam ads.
Pretty worthless hypocrisy, Google. Who is trying to turn the web into a cesspool full of fraudulent ads and corporate misinformation? This company:
Top and latest news for Search Engine Optimization (SEO), Internet Marketing and Technology.